Protocol Fees

Search…
Protocol Fees
This section talks about how the ARTH platform changes fees to keep the protocol stable.
Fees are charged by the protocol on various actions performed by users on the protocol. The ARTH platform charges three kinds of fees:
Mint & Redemption Fees in ETH and ARTH
Stability Fees in MAHA
A refundable liquidation fee (also called as the liquidation reserve) in ARTH (currently set at 50 ARTH)
Stability Fees
Stability fees is a mechanism that is being used to encourage or discourage collateral redemption from within the protocol. Stability fees is charged in MAHA tokens and is calculated as a percentage of the collateral that is being redeemed.
MAHA tokens charged from the stability fee is burnt off from the supply.
When governance predicts that the protocol is at high risk of losing its collateral, it sets the stability fee at a higher percentage (from 5-20%). When governance predicts that the protocol is under low risk, then the stability fees is reduced to 0-5%.
The stability fee is an extra measure to influence the redemption Behavior of ARTH but is not currently active.
Fee Schedule
Redemption and issuance fees are based on the baseRate state variable in the TroveManager, which is dynamically updated. The baseRate increases with each redemption, and decays according to time passed since the last fee event - i.e. the last redemption or issuance of ARTH.
Upon each redemption:
baseRate is decayed based on time passed since the last fee event
baseRate is incremented by an amount proportional to the fraction of the total ARTH supply that was redeemed
The redemption rate is given by min{REDEMPTION_FEE_FLOOR + baseRate * ETHdrawn, DECIMAL_PRECISION}
Upon each debt issuance:
baseRate is decayed based on time passed since the last fee event
The borrowing rate is given by min{BORROWING_FEE_FLOOR + baseRate * newDebtIssued, MAX_BORROWING_FEE}
REDEMPTION_FEE_FLOOR and BORROWING_FEE_FLOOR are both set to 0.5%, while MAX_BORROWING_FEE is 1% and DECIMAL_PRECISION is 100%. These values can be changed at any time via Governance.
Intuition behind fees
The larger the redemption volume, the greater the fee percentage. The longer the time delay since the last operation, the more the baseRate decreases.
The intent is to throttle large redemptions with higher fees, and to throttle borrowing directly after large redemption volumes. The baseRate decay over time ensures that the fee for both borrowers and redeemers will “cool down”, while redemptions volumes are low.
Furthermore, the fees cannot become smaller than 0.5%, which in the case of redemptions protects the redemption facility from being front-run by arbitrageurs that are faster than the price feed. The 5% maximum on the issuance is meant to keep the system (somewhat) attractive for new borrowers even in phases where the monetary is contracting due to redemptions.
Last modified 14h ago
Copy link
Edit on GitHub
Outline
Stability Fees
Fee Schedule
Intuition behind fees